New RNC 2006 Membership Card
posted by cpuaggie at 2:57 PM
Monday, January 30, 2006
About Me
- Name: cpuaggie
- Location: Bryan, Texas, United States
Some have described me as being a very passionate and dedicated person behind my quiet demeanor. Others, "What you see is what you get," which I agree with, in that I don't act differently around one group and a different way with others based on who I'm with at the time. I always seek to do God's Will in all things. That's the most important thing. Without him I am nothing. Everything I am and have, I owe to him. It's important to thank him for the little things. Keeping life in that perspective has made a great deal of difference during my pilgrimage in this world.
Previous Posts
- Fighting the Good Fight
- Survey!
- Texas A&M vs TSU (Closeup)
- BQ Ball Pics Part 1
- Chick-fil-a Corporate Headquarters
- The Justinator vs. The Fireplace
- An "Elementary" Walk Down Memory Lane
- To Post or Not to Post
- Seven
- Results of my T-shirt
14 Comments:
Sounds like a nice item to have in the winter.
Just toss it in the fire place were it belongs, and enjoy the warm, relaxing flames.
Easy for a member of the ever increasingly unpopular party to say:D
You tell him! WOOHOO for the RNC! Bush is the best! (and cutest!)
Joe, I know you liked my "wall of Bush" upstairs! :) I didn't even think about it until today...I walked by and thought "ha...I'm sure Joe liked that!"...maybe you didn't even notice...Bush is the man!
I too have my "wall of Bush." Included on the wall are 3 autographed pictures of George and Laura Bush, a letter of commendation from Ken Mehlman (the Chairman of the RNC), my 2005 RNC Charter Member Card, a color map of the voting returns for the sweeping presidential election, and a 2006 calendar Laura Bush sent me. Pretty cool, huh?:)
I just LOVED Bush's State of the Union Address. All the Democrats were seething with anger and jealousy because of Bush's success!
Lacey- for some reason I kept having the irresistable urge to tear it down and burn it. I guess you should be glad Ryan and Seth were there to keep me cool.
Man I wish I could find that picture of Harold Ford Jr. and me....
"All the Democrats were seething with anger and jealousy because of Bush's success!"
LOL!!!! Trust me dude, that ain't why we're angry. And the only reason we're not fighting back at the horrible outlashes Bush lays on us, is because we're too busy laughing at him try to give a public address using 2-or-more syllable words.
just keep laughing, brother...just keep laughing...
Sheesh! That's all you can say is how he spoke? Please tell me you were just kidding or my estimation of the Democratic party just fell further through the floor.
Ha! They were hardly clapping at all! And, Joe, why else would you be mad but that the Republicans are having enormous success?
Well Justin if you want me to give a full description of every problem I have with Bush, well... that could take years, and I have homework I need to be doing now so I dont want to bother with saying too much. Yall get the weirdest ideas of the way the Democratic party works, I mean 2 elections with a lameduck candidate in each major party and you think that its the Democrats that are "increasingly unpopular." I guarantee you 10 years ago a Massachusetts Democrat would have never been so close in an election as in 2004. The Democrats are so powerful its scary, I mean I dont want this nation to become too liberal.
Although, I would hardly consider the Republicans having any "success" right now Jesse. More like "public embarrassment," much the same as the Democrats were when Clinton had the affair. But of course Clinton still had the ability to get the job done, instead of ask his advisors (who are not in a presidential position and definently not capable of doing that job on top of their own) what to do. Would you could the fact that the gas prices have doubled since Clinton left office any evidence of Bush's poor economic management? But of course you'll likely find excuses to deny it to any of his fault (eg. "Bush isnt responsible for gas prices," "Its all delayed, its really all Clinton fault and we're seeing the effect of it now"). So thats fine, keep looking at Bush and the big, savior thats keeping this country out of danger.
I'm sorry to be so agressive on your blog Justin, but hope you dont mind a good political feud once in awhile. Its nothing personal, and I still love you as a brother, just to let you know.
Oh no, you're fine. I'm just looking at the fact that the Republicans hold the majority after quite a few Dems were unseated in both houses as well as the white house and Bush was re-elected with a marjin of some 3,012,497 votes.
Now about oil prices. You're claiming that it's all Bush's fault, eh? How could you be so naive? OPEC for the most part controls oil prices. Didn't you also argue that the whole reason we went for Iraq was oil? Then where the heck is it? Oil is not under the control of any one man, even Clinton.
The economy is booming, much to the Dems disppointment. Even if you watch the Liberally biased media, you'd know that. They're actually admitting that the economy is getting much better than what was left after the Clinton years. They've also admitted that the unemployment rate has dropped to a 4.5 year low. You can look up these facts if you wish, but as you can see the facts are against you. People are tired of the Liberal's "It's Bush's fault" and they proved that in the last election and they'll prove it again in the next election.
Btw, we've discussed all this on trog and in person. Must we bring it up again?
"Bush was re-elected with a marjin of some 3,012,497 votes."
Yea, although there was a record-shattering over 150 million voters in this past election. Although, I wouldnt really count overall votes as opposed to electoral college, which was just about dead even, just one state for Bush that gave him the victory (because Kerry just had to be a quitter instead of filing lawsuits and getting the state he rightfully won given to him). Anyway, I wouldnt give Gore credit for having an overall majority of the votes in 2000 either, because I mean both candidates are focusing on gaining votes for a better electoral college, not on gaining an overall majority. Had both Gore and Bush been campaigning for a majority, who knows what could have been done differently, and it could have even resulted in Bush winning the majority.
"You're claiming that it's all Bush's fault, eh? How could you be so naive? OPEC for the most part controls oil prices.
I didnt say its all Bush's fault. Though I do knock him for most of it, including how poorly he handled our situation with foreign suppliers, and OPEC.
"Didn't you also argue that the whole reason we went for Iraq was oil? Then where the heck is it? Oil is not under the control of any one man, even Clinton."
While given that its not entirely under one man's control, it is under the control of our government as a whole, whom consists largely of a Republican majority and a poorly established Bush administration. But don't ask me why Bush hasnt claimed the prize for a war he hasnt come close to finishing yet. I just find it odd that there's millions of terrorists around the world just as bad and threatening as Saddam Hussein and yet he goes and declares war on a country (a war planned since the Clinton adminstration, long before the Bush administration could make a public outcry about this scare of "WMDs") who has one of the largest oil reserves in the world.
Not to mention his eagerness to ruin our wildlife for extra oil in Alaska (which we will get to eventually anyway, at a gradual pace that will be less of a negative effect on our wildlife). If you ask me is this guy or isnt he oil hungry?
"The economy is booming, much to the Dems disppointment."
You call stocks dropping, gas prices swarming, and the unemployment rate at an alltime high since the great depression a "booming economy?"
"They're actually admitting that the economy is getting much better than what was left after the Clinton years. They've also admitted that the unemployment rate has dropped to a 4.5 year low. You can look up these facts if you wish, but as you can see the facts are against you. People are tired of the Liberal's "It's Bush's fault" and they proved that in the last election and they'll prove it again in the next election."
LOL!!! i'd like to know where you got all that information. Surely if thats true there should be a trustworthy news site that gives convincing information to confirm it.
"Btw, we've discussed all this on trog and in person. Must we bring it up again?"
Well if you prefer not, I certainly do not wish to pose such a burden to you on your own blog, and sincerely apologize if I have done so. But I am always eager and willing to debate politics to the best extent I can reach (so long as I'm not ganged up on by 4-5 Republicans all at once).
Since you just reaffirmed my first 2 points, I'll move on.
Iraq is not the only country on "America's hit-list." Iraq was chosen first because it was the most immediate threat, seeing as there were satellite photos of WMD's (some of which have been found) and the fact that Hussein openly threatened the U.S. with nuclear weapons. That on top of the fact that he would slaughter his own people makes him a WMD in and of itself which would be a good enough reason by itself. Why would that not be evidence enough to take him out?
As you might have heard on the news lately, Iran has been threatening to develop nuclear weapons and has been deemed by countries other than the U.S. as a big problem (such as Israel). Iran is next.
*sigh* You just won't give up about the "precious Alaskan wildlife", will you. As I and others have argued before, the amount of wildlife affected by the drilling is minimal and the caribou that live up there actually like the pipelines. In fact, in other pipeline and oil drill locations, it's caused a huge spike in the population.
It's so entertaining when the Liberals are so blatantly hypocritical with this oil business. Liberals blame Bush for the high gas prices, yet when he tries to do anything about it, the Liberals don't like that either. Can't win with a doom and gloom party.
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the current unemployment rate is 4.7% and falling. This implies an increasing economic rate. The Productivity Index has also been increasing and as of 2005 was at +2.7%. What more evidence do you need?
The Detroit Free Press and the Houston Chronicle have reported the lowest unemployment rate in 4.5 years. Fox News did too, but you probably wouldn't consider that a legit source:D
I rest my case.
Post a Comment
<< Home